Sunday, September 20 2026

Manner's Retro Glass Cup Giveaway Falls Flat: Why Buy-One-Get-One Promos No Longer Excite Consumers

Manner has always been known for its frequent free cup promotions, and the combination of set meals plus giveaways was once regarded by many users as a high-value choice. However, the recently launched retro glass cup giveaway unexpectedly fell flat—the cups the staff had prepared in advance went untouched, and the expected surge in orders never materialized. Why did a giveaway that was once so popular fail this time? A mix of factors is at play: the appearance not matching expectations, the set meal pairings not suiting people's tastes, the cup material not being heat-resistant, and consumers becoming increasingly rational. When buy-one-get-one promotions can no longer easily spark the urge to purchase, the promotional logic of coffee brands may be facing a turning point. [more…]

Starbucks Buy-One-Get-One promotion sparks employee complaints, the problems behind store order surges and consumer voices

Recently, Starbucks' buy-one-get-one-free promotion has sparked heated discussion on social media. A netizen claiming to be a Starbucks employee posted a complaint that the promotion led to a surge in store orders and excessive work intensity, and even called for the promotion to be canceled. At the same time, some consumers also agreed, saying that two drinks for one person is too much and hoping it could be changed to half price for a single cup. Despite the ongoing controversy, delivery platforms still show free shipping and a 50% discount on two cups. The brand has not yet explained the reason for the cancellation of the promotion. This article will sort out the course of the incident, the different voices of employees and consumers, and the current actual status of the promotion. [more…]

Chagee's limited-time buy-one-get-one promotion hits a snag midway: ingredient shortages at stores in multiple regions, drinks in the discount section pulled one after another

On Monday of this week, Chagee launched a five-day limited-time promotion. From March 2 to March 6, consumers could enjoy a buy-one-get-one-free offer on exclusive drinks purchased daily from 9:30 to 10:30 through the "Morning Elephant Good" early-series section of the official mini-program. During the promotion period, 100,000 cups of milk tea were also given away each day for 0.01 yuan through a password-guessing format. The event attracted a large number of milk tea fans right from the start, who raced to grab coupons at the exact time and invited others to join group orders, while buyer show-off posts on social media also helped drive its spread. However, by the third day, users in many places reported that multiple exclusive drinks in the event section showed as sold out and could not be ordered, and that the drink categories available at some stores did not match the eight officially advertised. Some new products were even marked as sold out in the event area while still being available for regular single-item ordering through other channels. Stores explained that materials were being consumed too quickly and that they could only adjust delistings based on inventory, but consumers did not fully accept this explanation. [more…]

Guming's Buy-One-Get-One Free Order Surge Dilemma: Employees Peel Fruit for Over Ten Hours Straight, an Imbalance Between Brand Campaigns and Store Capacity

Recently, Gu Ming launched a "Summer Buy One Get One Free" campaign, with 8 star products participating, originally intended to attract foot traffic and boost revenue. However, after the campaign went live, store orders far exceeded expectations, and back-of-house staff were forced to handle fresh fruit, whip cream, and other prep work under high intensity for long hours. Some worked 15.5 hours straight, and their hands cramped from peeling grapes. The brand's frequent collaborations, takeout wars, and limited-time offers have left the "farm tea workers" complaining endlessly, and also exposed the disconnect between campaign planning and store staffing and process simplification. This article reviews the real situation of this order surge and the voices of employees, while also offering coffee lovers a product perspective from brands such as Front Street Coffee. [more…]

The New Battleground for Coffee Brand Promotions: Free Gifts, Not for Sale—Why Do Consumers Care More About the Packaging Than the Coffee?

Recently, the coffee industry has seen a surge in the trend of offering free merchandise with purchases. Brands such as Starbucks, Manner, and Luckin have rolled out limited-edition trinkets, from wooden fish ornaments to co-branded canvas tote bags and blind-box pins, attracting a large number of consumers to place orders just for the freebies. This promotional model of giving items away rather than selling them has gradually turned the coffee brand war into a competition of merchandise design. While consumers chase limited-edition gifts, their attention to the drinks themselves is declining. This article will review recent buy-one-get-one promotions by various brands and analyze the consumer psychology and industry impact behind this phenomenon. [more…]

Lisa's photo sparks hype for Heytea's matcha series, but global buy-one-get-one-free promotion stirs controversy over ingredient shortages

Blackpink member Lisa inadvertently showed off a cup of Heytea's Triple Thick Matcha on social media, quickly sparking global fan attention. Multiple Heytea overseas official accounts swiftly claimed it and seized the moment to launch a "Lisa Custom Edition," then further rolled out a buy-one-get-one-free matcha series promotion at stores worldwide. However, on the day of the promotion, consumers in many parts of China found that the matcha drinks were sold out early, and some even received incorrectly made beverages. Stores explained that ingredients were consumed too quickly and prep took time, but some fans were not buying it, arguing that if the brand wanted to ride a celebrity's hype, it should have prepared adequately in advance. [more…]

Manner mug handles break one after another, and co-branded ceramic cups also show defects, raising questions about quality control of giveaway items once again.

At the end of last month, Manner launched a buy-one-get-one promotion for the Year of the Dragon, and its retro mugs won over many customers with their good looks, prompting them to purchase the bundles. Recently, however, a number of netizens reported that the handles broke less than a month after use, and some even suffered cuts. Earlier, the mugs had already been criticized for poor quality control, including color discrepancies, chips, leaks, and crooked handles. At the same time, the ceramic cups from Manner's collaboration with Wedgwood were also found to have defects such as incomplete gilded detailing, cracked handles, and scratches on the cup body. The repeated failures in freebie quality have greatly undermined consumers' trust in Manner's gift promotions. [more…]

A New Coffee Brand Promotion Tactic: Free Gifts with Purchase, Giveaways Only—Consumers Buy for the Collectibles

In recent years, the promotional methods in the coffee industry have quietly changed, shifting from pure price wars to marketing battles over limited-edition freebies with purchases. Chain brands like Starbucks, Manner, and Luckin have rolled out distinctive gift promotions, enticing consumers to buy coffee in order to collect coveted merchandise. This "gift-only, never-for-sale" model not only helps brands stand out in fierce competition, but also reflects the younger consumers' psychology of valuing the container more than its contents. This article reviews the latest buy-and-get promotions from major brands and explores the market logic and consumer mindset behind this phenomenon. [more…]

Why are Starbucks delivery drinks often not filled to the top? The company advises drinking them as soon as possible, while consumers are calling for greater consistency in product quality.

Recently, there have been many complaints on social media about Starbucks delivery drinks not being filled to the top, involving the Mousse Espresso series, drinks with cream on top, and some hot beverages. Images shared by netizens show that upon delivery, the liquid level is noticeably lower than in-store offerings. A customer used a buy-one-get-one coupon to purchase two Rum Mousse Espresso Lattes, and one of them was not full. Customer service only compensated with a 10-yuan delivery coupon. Starbucks officially explains that the top of the Cloud Macchiato series is made by whipping light cream with milk, while the Mousse Espresso series involves whipping espresso into a mousse texture. For these drinks, the milk foam or coffee foam dissipates over time, and the ordering interface also reminds customers to drink them promptly. Consumers hope the official will pay attention to the consistency between delivery and in-store offerings, or consider not listing such drinks on delivery platforms. Front Street Coffee continues to monitor coffee industry trends and brings you professional insights. [more…]

Manner quietly gives away Meiji chocolate offline, low-key in-store promotion sparks consumer discussion

Recently, a customer buying coffee at a Manner store unexpectedly received a Meiji chocolate from the staff as a gift. This hidden perk, which had not been publicly promoted, quickly drew attention on social media. It is understood that consumers must purchase this week's SOE coffee through offline stores or the mini-program to receive it, and the quantity is limited on a first-come, first-served basis. Some staff were not very clear about the campaign rules, causing a few customers to fail to receive it as expected. Loyal Manner users pointed out that this is not the first time the brand has quietly given out chocolate, as a similar surprise also occurred earlier this year. Consumers have differing opinions on whether it should be publicly promoted, with some calling for greater transparency and others believing that keeping it a niche perk is more in line with the brand's original intention. [more…]

1 Dian Dian's co-branded San Pellegrino Sparkling Tea sparks controversy: the complimentary sparkling water turns out to be opened leftover materials

Recently, 1 Dian Dian partnered with Italian mineral water brand San Pellegrino to launch two limited-edition new products, "Grape Sparkling Tea" and "Double Yuzu Sparkling Tea," sold as combo sets. Consumers could receive a store-made sparkling tea, a bottle of San Pellegrino sparkling water, and limited-edition packaging all at once. However, after the new products launched, many consumers discovered that the complimentary San Pellegrino sparkling water included with their order had already been opened, with only a small amount of liquid remaining in the bottle, sparking concerns about beverage hygiene and delivery safety. Some delivery users also reported not receiving the sparkling water or the limited-edition packaging, which did not match the official promotion. In response, some netizens explained that the complimentary sparkling water was actually leftover material from making the sparkling tea, a routine practice in tea shops. But some consumers still believed that after opening, the carbon dioxide in the sparkling water easily escapes during delivery, greatly diminishing the taste, and suggested that the brand directly provide unopened products so customers can mix it themselves. This article will delve into the ins and outs of this incident and the various viewpoints of all parties. [more…]

Decathlon Crosses Over into the Coffee Market, First Coffee Corner Lands in Shanghai Wujiaochang

The coffee consumption boom continues to heat up, and even outdoor sports brands can no longer resist trying their hand at crossing over. French outdoor brand Decathlon recently opened its first coffee corner inside its Shanghai Wujiaochang store, formally stepping onto the coffee track. During the opening period, customers who bought drinks in-store could take part in a giveaway of limited-edition camping cups, drawing a large number of consumers to visit and check in. However, the huge turnout also exposed a lack of operational experience, with frequent problems such as the online mini-program crashing, stores being overwhelmed with orders, and one-hour queues. In addition to regular coffee, the Decathlon coffee corner has also launched sports-themed special drinks that match the brand's tone, with prices following an affordable approach. Whether this kind of crossover play can be sustained is worth watching. [more…]

Milk tea shop community group buying involved in fraud with nearly 200 million in transaction flow; after the brand terminated cooperation, the store changed its sign and continued operating.

A bubble tea franchise store in Wuxi appears to run community group buys and membership top-ups on the surface, but behind the scenes it is suspected of large-scale fraud. Over a thousand local people have fallen victim, with transaction flows of nearly 200 million yuan, and even people in Shanghai, Zhejiang, Anhui and other places have been caught up in it. Even more surprisingly, the operator had compulsory measures changed because of pregnancy, and afterward continued to operate and keep selling low-priced products. The brand owner eventually announced the termination of cooperation and removed the signage, but the store changed its name and still opened as usual, and was still constantly hiring. What exactly is going on? What should ordinary consumers and job seekers pay attention to? [more…]

A Comprehensive Review of Manner Coffee's Cross-Industry Collaborations: From Tesla to LV, the Market Logic Behind Brand Partnerships

Manner Coffee has once again drawn attention, this time by teaming up with Tesla for a co-branded campaign. As a recognized master of collaborations in the coffee world, Manner's cross-industry footprint has already covered automobiles, luxury goods, beauty, sports, and many other sectors. From NIO to LV, from Helena Rubinstein to Allbirds, each partnership has precisely captured the brand tone, creating a win-win of both buzz and sales. This article will review Manner's major co-branding cases over the years, analyze the brand strategy and consumer psychology behind its success, and include professional information recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Luckin's limited-edition collab cups were promoted as being different from reality, leaving consumers in many places going home empty-handed and sparking heated discussion.

Luckin Coffee's recently launched co-branded limited-edition takeaway cups have sparked widespread discussion on social media. Some consumers reported that after seeing promotions in livestreams and placing orders, they were told upon arriving at stores that the limited-edition cups were out of stock and would not be restocked, leaving them to accept ordinary cold drink cups instead. In Hainan, Jilin, and other regions, plastic ban policies prevented the use of these injection-molded cups, yet official channels continued to display promotional images, causing customers to make futile trips to stores. In addition, issues such as the absence of notices in the promotions indicating limited quantities and the failure to promptly update promotional images after stores ran out of stock left both consumers and store employees frustrated. Front Street Coffee notes that this incident reflects shortcomings in the brand's management of peripheral materials and promotional standards. [more…]

Heytea's Golden Phoenix Tea Pastry buy-one-get-one-free promotion sold out as soon as it started, and consumers are questioning the stores' stock arrangements.

Heytea today launched a limited-time buy-one-get-one-free promotion for its Golden Phoenix Tea Pastry, but as soon as the promotion began, a large number of consumers found that the promotion link showed it was sold out, while the non-promotion link for the same product could still be ordered normally, sparking confusion and dissatisfaction. This is not the first time Heytea has run into controversy over a buy-one-get-one-free promotion. Last week's matcha buy-one-get-one-free offer also led to multiple stores removing the item due to insufficient materials. Is it insufficient inventory preparation, or differences in store operating strategies? This article sorts through the course of events and the accounts from all sides to get to the bottom of it. [more…]

Manner's frequent free cup promotions are causing employee fatigue, and the pressure of sudden order surges at stores, along with the feedback mechanism, is being called into question.

Manner recently launched a two-cup set promotion for its roasted nut latte, offering a lilac ceramic cup, which attracted a large number of merchandise enthusiasts to snap it up. However, during the promotion, store orders surged and service speed dropped sharply. Some customers only got the cup but never received their drinks, and regulars switched to other brands as a result. Employees, suffering under intense workloads, complained that promotions were too frequent and staffing was insufficient, while the company's feedback channel was described as virtually useless. This article sorts out the chain reactions triggered by the promotion, presenting the dual plight of employees and customers. [more…]

Jasmine Naibai Strawberry New Product Fails to Match Promotion, Consumers Question Inconsistency Between Description and Reality

The limited-edition drinks "Strawberry White Chocolate" and "Strawberry White Chocolate Rice Mochi," launched in collaboration between Molly Tea and *Barbie*, sparked consumer complaints due to a massive discrepancy between the actual product and the official promotional images. The promotional image showed a thick layer of strawberry chunks filling the bottom of the cup, but the drinks customers actually received contained so little fruit that it was barely noticeable. Some customers strained out the fruit with a sieve and put it back into the cup, only to find the actual portion fell far short of the poster. The store explained that, because customers had complained the fruit pieces were too large and hard to sip, the strawberries had been mashed, and that shaking during delivery would also cause the fruit to mix with the liquid. However, the official promotional image carried no disclaimer such as "actual product may vary," leading consumers to suspect false advertising and demand refunds. Reporters from this publication visited two stores in Wuhan, placed orders, and conducted hands-on tests, confirming that the actual product indeed did not match the promotion. [more…]

Starbucks System Glitch Triggers Rush for Two Cups for 9 Yuan, 49.9 Yuan Women's Day Promotion Accidentally Leaks Low-Price Loophole

After Luckin Coffee's 9.9 yuan promotion was scaled back, brands like Cotti Coffee and Tims rolled out short-term 9.9 yuan offers to grab market share. Starbucks, which once declared it would "compete on market, not price," recently suffered a system glitch during its March 8 Women's Day promotion, accidentally letting some consumers buy two large drinks for just 9 yuan. The loophole quickly sparked a frenzy of deal-hunting on social media, with some successfully placing orders while others had their payments canceled and refunded after checkout. Starbucks quickly fixed the bug, and the promotional price returned to 49.9 yuan for two cups. This accident not only gave consumers a taste of the thrill of "snagging a bargain," but also reignited discussion about the coffee price war. [more…]

Luckin Persimmon Daifuku group-buy promotion mismatched with actual product sparks controversy, discussion on who bears responsibility for false advertising

As the Spring Festival approaches, major coffee chains are rolling out promotional new products to capture holiday traffic. After launching the Year of the Dragon sauce-flavored chocolate in a second collaboration with Moutai, Luckin Coffee quickly followed up with the Han Meilin co-branded New Year Red Dragon Latte and a matching dessert, Persimmon Daifuku. However, this dessert, which had been highly anticipated, drew complaints from consumers who said the group-buy advertising seriously mismatched the actual product, sparking heated discussion about false advertising and where responsibility lies. Some netizens argued that Luckin cannot escape blame for lax review, while others pointed out that the root cause is some group-buy bloggers using footage of other products to earn commissions. Behind the incident, the review mechanisms of brand marketing and the issue of consumer trust are worth pondering. [more…]